Table 2.
Intensive | Linkage | Nivel | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics of case management |
|
|
|
|
Facilitating |
Using existing non-dementia case management models as example |
+ |
|
|
Impeding |
Disagreement about content of case manager tasks |
|
- |
- |
Partners do not see the added value of a case manager who only mediates |
|
- |
|
|
Speed of implementation depends on mentality and cultural values of the region |
|
- |
|
|
Time and other operational preconditions |
|
|
|
|
Facilitating |
Sufficient time to set up an organizational structure |
|
+ |
+ |
Impeding |
Professionals don't have innovation time; consensus among many collaboration partners takes time |
- |
|
|
No clear guidelines for implementation |
|
- |
- |
|
Human and financial resources |
|
|
|
|
Facilitating |
Retraining district nurses to become case managers facilitates collaboration with the GP as they have pre-existing partnerships |
+ |
|
|
Presence of a clear initiator of the implementation |
+ |
|
|
|
Impeding |
Proliferation of different types of case managers created friction among providers |
|
- |
- |
Lack of clarity about the role of the project leader (not knowing who is their superior) |
|
- |
|
|
Organizational conditions |
|
|
|
|
Facilitating |
Embedding case management in Mental Health Care promotes collaboration |
+ |
|
|
Embedding the multidisciplinary expert team in case management organization |
+ |
|
|
|
Good collaboration between case managers from competitive providers provides the opportunity to learn from each other |
|
+ |
+ |
|
Case managers from one provider all working in the same room enhances sparring and consultation |
|
+ |
|
|
Presence of a Board of Representatives to guide the dementia care network. |
|
+ |
+ |
|
Presence of fixed stakeholders at partners in the dementia care network whom case managers can contact |
+ |
|
+ |
|
Impeding |
Presence of competitive providers of case management within the dementia care network |
|
- |
- |
Different interests of the Board of Representatives; incomplete attendance during meetings; members without mandate to make decisions. |
|
- |
|
|
Expert team doe not function properly; difficult to reach clinicians as members participate only a few hours per week. |
- |
|
|
|
Lack of clarity about who is responsible for what aspects of implementation and collaboration |
|
- |
|
|
Only incorporating dementia care partners with the strongest pre-existing relationships at the start | - |
+ = facilitating factor, - = impeding factor, a blank cell means a factor was not extracted from interviews in regions within this model or the Nivel study.