Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2014 Jul 21;55(7):4512–4524. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-13937

Table 2.

Correlations Between RGC+IPL Thickness and mfERG Functional Measures by Animal and Eye (Last Session)

Animal	% Loss of RGC+IPL in Exp	mfPhNR				mfOP				mfLFC (Normalized Data)
		Con		Exp		Con		Exp		Con		Exp
		r²	P	r²	P	r²	P	r²	P	r²	P	r²	P
OHT-57	5	0.51	<0.001	0.00	0.711	0.38	<0.001	0.02	0.362	0.48	<0.001	0.19	0.007
OHT-59	17	0.00	0.693	0.11	0.050	0.67	<0.001	0.51	<0.001	0.81	<0.001	0.22	0.004
OHT-58	20	0.64	<0.001	0.22	0.005	0.58	<0.001	0.68	<0.001	0.74	<0.001	0.22	0.005
OHT-60	22	0.38	<0.001	0.01	0.517	0.61	<0.001	0.01	0.514	0.24	0.002	0.43	<0.001
OHT-61	28	0.45	<0.001	0.22	0.004	0.22	0.003	0.06	0.156	0.42	<0.001	0.01	0.532
Average		0.40		0.11		0.49		0.26		0.54		0.21
All animals combined		0.34	<0.001	0.29	<0.001	0.33	<0.001	0.35	<0.001	0.51	<0.001	0.17	<0.001