Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 21;55(7):4512–4524. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-13937

Table 3.

Percent Loss in RGC+IPL Thickness and mfERG Functional Measures (Mean ± SE)

Group
RGC+IPL Thickness
mfPhNR
mfOP RMS
mfLFC RMS
Hemifield S 13.0 ± 3.6 28.1 ± 10.9 43.5 ± 10.8 35.3 ± 9.4
I 11.6 ± 2.8 34.1 ± 12.1 47.8 ± 10.8 38.2 ± 8.5
Ring C 20.2 ± 7.6 32.6 ± 13.0 44.8 ± 10.8 37.2 ± 10.6
R1 18.3 ± 5.5 32.5 ± 12.5 46.1 ± 10.3 37.0 ± 10.3
R2 14.6 ± 3.8 33.8 ± 11.4 45.7 ± 10.6 36.6 ± 9.5
R3 9.6 ± 2.6 31.2 ± 10.0 43.9 ± 11.4 36.8 ± 8.5
Quadrant SN 13.7 ± 6.3 27.0 ± 14.7 40.4 ± 12.3 28.7 ± 11.5
ST 12.3 ± 2.6 29.3 ± 7.5 45.0 ± 10.6 40.7 ± 8.5
IT 12.0 ± 3.1 35.0 ± 11.7 52.3 ± 8.6 41.6 ± 10.2
IN 11.4 ± 2.7 32.8 ± 12.9 40.9 ± 13.8 32.9 ± 8.0

Descriptive statistics listed in this table were derived from last-session data plotted in Figure 8 for different grouping strategies.