Table 2.
Mosquito |
δ15N
|
δ13C
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Mean ± SEa | Tukey’s HSDb | n | Mean ± SE | Tukey’s HSD | |
Natural abundancec | ||||||
Male | 19 | 4.0 ± 0.9 | A | 19 | −28.1 ± 0.6 | A |
Female | 5 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | a | 5 | −25.4 ± 0.4 | a |
Control | ||||||
Male | 10 | 10.7 ± 0.2 | A | 10 | −22.5 ± 0.8 | A |
Female | 2 | 9.5, 11.0 | a | 2 | −19.2, ±19.2 | a |
Larvae | 3 | 10.9 ± 0.5 | A | 3 | −19.2 ± 0.3 | A |
Low treatmentd | ||||||
Zero days post-emergence | ||||||
Male | 3 | 165.5 ± 9.2 | B | 4 | 108.3 ± 20.3 | C |
Female | 3 | 164.8 ± 11.3 | b | 2 | 78.9, 99.9 | b |
Larvae | 3 | 217.8 ± 2.9 | BC | 3 | 76.1 ± 3.6 | BC |
Poole | 2 | 25.6, 47.6 | A | 2 | 0.6, 44.7 | AB |
Five days post-emergence | ||||||
Male | 4 | 190.0 ± 19.4 | B | 3 | 27.0 ± 1.9 | B |
Female | 4 | 26.7 ± 12.3 | a | |||
Twenty-five days post-emergence | ||||||
Male | 4 | 169.5 ± 12.2 | B | 2 | 10.2, 41.8 | AB |
Female | 4 | 1.5 ± 2.7 | a | |||
High treatment | ||||||
Zero days post-emergence | ||||||
Male | 4 | 264.2 ± 37.8 | C | 2 | 283.1, 320.4 | D |
Female | 2 | 169.0, 187.3 | b | |||
Larvae | 3 | 185.3 ± 3.7 | B | 3 | 264.6 ± 12.5 | D |
Five days post-emergence | ||||||
Male | 3 | 125.2 ± 42.0 | C | |||
Female | 2 | 84.3, 258.3 | b | |||
Twenty-five days post-emergence | ||||||
Male | 5 | 222.3 ± 23.1 | BC | 4 | 89.5 ± 17.8 | BC |
Female | 1 | 71.6 | ab |
When sample size was less than three, actual values are presented.
Tukey’s HSD test for differences among means (P < 0.05) were run separately for males and females and results are provided as upper case letters and lower case letters, respectively. Larvae and pools were included with the males for the post-hoc tests.
Cx pipiens collected from seven different catch basins in 2009.
Stable isotope concentrations were 0.33 and 1.04 atom% 15N and 0.24 and 0.76 atom% 13C for the low and high treatment, respectively.
Pool contained one adult female from 15N treatment and four natural abundance adult females collected from the field.