Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Entomol. 2012 Jan;49(1):61–70. doi: 10.1603/me11076

Table 2.

Experiment 2 results showing δ15N and δ13C mean ± SE for adult male and female Cx. pipiens from the natural abundance, control, and stable isotope enriched mosquitoes at different days post-emergence

Mosquito δ15N
δ13C
n Mean ± SEa Tukey’s HSDb n Mean ± SE Tukey’s HSD
Natural abundancec
  Male 19 4.0 ± 0.9 A 19 −28.1 ± 0.6 A
  Female 5 1.3 ± 0.8 a 5 −25.4 ± 0.4 a
Control
  Male 10 10.7 ± 0.2 A 10 −22.5 ± 0.8 A
  Female 2 9.5, 11.0 a 2 −19.2, ±19.2 a
  Larvae 3 10.9 ± 0.5 A 3 −19.2 ± 0.3 A
Low treatmentd
 Zero days post-emergence
  Male 3 165.5 ± 9.2 B 4 108.3 ± 20.3 C
  Female 3 164.8 ± 11.3 b 2 78.9, 99.9 b
  Larvae 3 217.8 ± 2.9 BC 3 76.1 ± 3.6 BC
  Poole 2 25.6, 47.6 A 2 0.6, 44.7 AB
 Five days post-emergence
  Male 4 190.0 ± 19.4 B 3 27.0 ± 1.9 B
  Female 4 26.7 ± 12.3 a
 Twenty-five days post-emergence
  Male 4 169.5 ± 12.2 B 2 10.2, 41.8 AB
  Female 4 1.5 ± 2.7 a
High treatment
 Zero days post-emergence
  Male 4 264.2 ± 37.8 C 2 283.1, 320.4 D
  Female 2 169.0, 187.3 b
  Larvae 3 185.3 ± 3.7 B 3 264.6 ± 12.5 D
 Five days post-emergence
  Male 3 125.2 ± 42.0 C
  Female 2 84.3, 258.3 b
 Twenty-five days post-emergence
  Male 5 222.3 ± 23.1 BC 4 89.5 ± 17.8 BC
  Female 1 71.6 ab
a

When sample size was less than three, actual values are presented.

b

Tukey’s HSD test for differences among means (P < 0.05) were run separately for males and females and results are provided as upper case letters and lower case letters, respectively. Larvae and pools were included with the males for the post-hoc tests.

c

Cx pipiens collected from seven different catch basins in 2009.

d

Stable isotope concentrations were 0.33 and 1.04 atom% 15N and 0.24 and 0.76 atom% 13C for the low and high treatment, respectively.

e

Pool contained one adult female from 15N treatment and four natural abundance adult females collected from the field.