Table 5.
Adult Culex pipiens wing length (mm) from the different treatments in each experiment
| Experiment | Treatment | Male wing length (mm)
|
Female wing length (mm)
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Mean ± SE | Tukey’s HSDa | n | Mean ± SEb | Tukey’s HSD | ||
| 1 | Control | 10 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 13 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | AB | |
| 15N Low | 14 | 3.1 ± 0.0 | 12 | 3.7 ± 0.0 | B | ||
| 15N Med | 12 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 12 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | AB | ||
| 15NHigh | 13 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 15 | 3.5 ± 0.0 | A | ||
| 2 | Control | 5 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2 | 2.9, 3.6 | ||
| 15N Low | 8 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 1 | 4.0 | |||
| 15NHigh | 3 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 1 | 3.0 | |||
| 13C Low | 9 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 8 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | |||
| 13CHigh | 5 | 2.8 ± 0.0 | 5 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | |||
| 3 | Control | 10 | 3.4 ± 0.0 | 10 | 3.7 ± 0.0 | a | |
| 15N | 17 | 3.2 ± 0.0 | 10 | 4.0 ± 0.0 | b | ||
| 13C | 13 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 9 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | ab | ||
a
Post-hoc tests show differences among means. Blank values indicate no difference among groups.
b
When sample size was less than three, actual values are presented.