Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2007 May-Jun;78(3):972–986. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01044.x

Table 2.

Twin Intraclass and Cross-Correlations for Hyperactivity and Achievement

Males
Females
Intraclass correlations MZ, r DZ, r MZ, r DZ, r
Unadjusted achievementa .85** .47** .80** .52**
Achievement .77** .47** .72** .51**
Hyperactivity
 Parent ratings .57** −.04 .55** −.08
 Same teacher rating .76** .38** .72** .28**
 Different teacher rating .64** .20 * .49** .20 *
Twin cross-correlations

Hyperactivity × Unadjusted Achievement
 Parent ratings −.28** −.07 −.21** −.08
 Same teacher rating −.35** −.25** −.37** −.22**
 Different teacher rating −.34** −.17* −.40** −.18*
Hyperactivity × Achievement
 Parent ratings −.24** −.07 −.18** −.06
 Same teacher rating −.34** −.22** −.33** −.19**
 Different teacher rating −.28** −.16* −.33** −.20*

Note. Number of twin pairs, parent ratings: MZ males = 405, DZ males = 381, MZ females = 475, DZ females = 427; same teacher ratings: MZ males = 281, DZ males = 271, MZ females = 334, DZ females = 311; different teacher ratings: MZ males = 164, DZ males = 152, MZ females = 177, DZ females = 146.

a

Scores were not residualized for general cognitive ability.

*

p<.05;

**

p<.01.