Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 19;2(5):744–750. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.319

Table V.

Previous phase II–III studies of platinum doublet and COX-2 inhibitor in NSCLC.

Design Author (year) No. of patients COX-2 inhibitor Chemotherapy Response rate (%) Median PFS (months) Median OS (months) (Refs.)
Phase II Edelman et al (2008) 45 Celecoxib CBDCA+GEM NA 4.3a 11.8 (23)
Wang et al (2008) 44 Celecoxib CDDP+GEM
CDDP+VNR
CDDP+DOC
45.0 6.0 18.0 (24)
Suzuki et al (2009) 44 Meloxicam CBDCA+PTX 43.0 5.4b 15.9 (35)
This study 50 Meloxicam CBDCA+DOC 36.0 5.7b 13.7
Phase III Groen et al (2011) 281 Celecoxib CBDCA+DOC 38.0 4.5 8.2 (21)
280 Placebo 30.0 4.0 8.2
 HR 0.8 0.9
 95% CI 0.6–1.1 0.6–1.2
 P-value 0.25 0.32
Koch et al (2011) 158 Celecoxib 3rd generation 36.0 6.1 8.9 (22)
158 Placebo Drug + platinum 31.0 6.5 7.9
 HR 1.01 1.0
 95% CI 0.77–1.33 0.79–1.26
 P-value 0.94 0.97
a

Failure-free survival.

b

Time-to-progression.

COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; CBDCA, carboplatin; GEM, gemcitabine; NA, not available; CDDP, cisplatin; VNR, vinorelbine; DOC, docetaxel; PTX, paclitaxel; HR, hazard ratio to placebo; CI, confidence interval.