. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 22.

Published in final edited form as: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Feb 1;31(2):301–311. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.000301

Table 2.

Calculated Efficiencies for Reflectance Predictions at Proximal and Distal Source Locations^a

			T [h]		R		Eff[ξ]
$μ_{s}^{'} ∕ μ_{a}$	g	ρ [mm]	DAW	CAW	DAW	CAW	DAW	CAW
100	0.9	[0—0.2]	28	29	0.0098	0.0098	372^*	359
100	0.9	[5.8—6]	28	29	0.0148	0.0148	163^*	157
10	0.9	[0—0.2]	26.7	26	0.0103	0.0104	353	356^*
10	0.9	[5.8—6]	26.7	26	0.0207	0.0204	87	92^*
1	0.9	[0—0.2]	19	13.7	0.0143	0.0148	257	333^*
1	0.9	[5.8—6]	19	13.7	0.0441	0.0352	27	59^*
100	0.0	[0—0.2]	2.8	2.9	0.0061	0.0062	9598^*	8971
100	0.0	[5.8—6]	2.8	2.9	0.0153	0.0153	1525^*	1473
10	0.0	[0—0.2]	2.9	2.5	0.0062	0.0064	8971	9766^*
10	0.0	[5.8—6]	2.9	2.5	0.0240	0.0217	598	849^*
1	0.0	[0—0.2]	3.6	1.5	0.0066	0.0087	6377	8808^*
1	0.0	[5.8—6]	3.6	1.5	0.1141	0.0463	21	311^*

Proximal (ρ ε [0—0.2] mm) and distal (ρ ε [5.8—6] mm), where $μ_{s}^{'} ∕ μ_{a} = 100, 10, 1$ and g = 0.9, 0. Efficiency values with an asterisk (*) indicate the larger value when comparing DAW with CAW.