Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 22;9(7):e101292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101292

Table 2. Imaging results compared with final diagnosis.

Appendicitis (n = 30) No appendicitis (n = 11)
Gray-scale ultrasonography
Diameter (≥6 mm) Present 30 2
Absent 0 9
Echogenicity of periappendiceal fat Present 30 2
Absent 0 9
Thickening of appendiceal wall Present 30 3
Absent 0 8
Appendicolith Present 10 0
Absent 20 11
Diameter (≥6 mm), echogenicity of periappendiceal fat, thickening of appendiceal wall Present (all) 30 2
Absent (one or more) 0 9
Shear wave elastography
Elastic modulus scale (kilopascal) ≥12.5 kPa 28 0
<12.5 kPa 2 11
Computed tomography
Diameter (≥6 mm) Present 30 0
Absent 0 11
Enhancement of periappendiceal fat Present 30 3
Absent 0 8
Thickening of appendiceal wall Present 30 2
Absent 0 9
Appendicolith Present 10 0
Absent 20 11
Diameter (≥6 mm), echogenicity of periappendiceal fat, thickening of appendiceal wall Present (all) 30 0
Absent (one or more) 0 11