Table 3. Diagnostic ability of gray-scale ultrasonography, shear wave elastography, and computed tomography in patients with suspected appendicitis.
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | |
Gray-scale ultrasonography | ||||
Diameter (≥6 mm) | 100 | 82 | 94 | 100 |
Echogenicity of periappendiceal fat | 100 | 82 | 94 | 100 |
Thickening of appendiceal wall | 100 | 73 | 91 | 100 |
Appendicolith | 33 | 100 | 100 | 35 |
Diameter (≥6 mm), Echogenicity of periappendiceal fat, thickening of appendiceal wall | 100 | 82 | 94 | 100 |
Shear wave elastography | ||||
Elastic modulus scale (≥12.5 kPa) | 93 | 100 | 100 | 85 |
Computed tomography | ||||
Diameter (≥6 mm) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Enhancement of periappendiceal fat | 100 | 73 | 91 | 100 |
Thickening of appendiceal wall | 100 | 82 | 94 | 100 |
Appendicolith | 33 | 100 | 100 | 35 |
Diameter (≥6 mm), enhancement of periappendiceal fat, thickening of appendiceal wall | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; kPa, kilopascal.