Table 1.
Author | n= | % female | mean age | Depression Scale | Mean Score of Aβ42 | % of Aβ42 difference between depressed and controls | ApoE4 status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baba, 2012 | 606 | 58.0% | 56.38(14.7) | HAM-D | 2.5 pg/ml | −15.4% | Differences were observed in the whole sample and in non-carriers |
Metti, 2012 | 988 | 55.20% | 74 | CES-D | 33.9pg/ml | no difference | No differences in carriers or non-carriers |
Moon, 2011 | 123 | 26% | 76 | GDS | 18.9pg/ml | +1.71% | n/a |
Blasko, 2010 | 331 | 56.50% | 75.8 | GDS | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Kita, 2009 | 120 | 57.50% | 55.8 | HAM-D | 3.3 pmol/l** | −2.1% | n/a |
Sun, 2009 | 1060 | 76% | 75.3 | CES-D | 18.8 pg/ml* | −12.3% | Differences were observed only in non-carriers |
Sun, 2008 | 995 | 61% | 75.3 | CES-D | 18.7 pg/ml* | −13.5% | n/a |
Sun, 2007 | 324 | 75% | 75 | CES-D | 16.9 pg/ml* | −37.2% | n/a |
Qiao Qiu, 2006 | 515 | 77% | 75.7 | CES-D | 33.1 pg/ml | −23.5% | n/a |
Pomara, 2006 | 82 | 69.50% | 75.3 | HAM-D | 14.51 pg/ml+ | +30% | n/a |
median used in measurements;
measurements from the elderly subgroup,
LLMD subjects only