Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2014 Feb 25;3(7):1086–1096. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201300646

Table 1. Study design with scaffold type and biomolecule supplementation combinations for each desired lineage.

Two scaffold types (six experimental groups total) were assayed for each lineage. CG and CGCaP scaffolds are sometimes referred to in the text as “nonmineralized” and “mineralized” respectively. Each lineage (tenogenic, chondrogenic, or osteogenic) included use of the standard scaffold group as well as a structurally-modified scaffold (anisotropic, low-density, or CGCaP, respectively). All variants were cultured in MSC growth media. Additionally, the structurally-modified scaffolds (and the standard scaffold in chondrogenic and osteogenic cases) were then cultured with differentiation media or growth media supplemented with growth factors as listed.

Lineage Biomolecule
treatment
Scaffold type, biomolecule dose
Tenogenic CG (standard) CG (anisotropic)
Growth media Yes Yes
bFGF 5 ng/mL
IGF-1 100 ng/mL
GDF-5 100 ng/mL
GDF-7 100 ng/mL
Chondrogenic CG (standard) CG (low density)
Growth media Yes Yes
Chondrogenic Yes Yes
TGF-β1 5 ng/mL
TGF-β3 5 ng/mL
Osteogenic CG (standard) CGCaP (40 wt% mineral)
Growth media Yes Yes
Osteogenic Yes Yes
BMP-2 50 ng/mL
BMP-7 50 ng/mL