Table 3.
Strain | n* | Habituation | Saline:Trial 1 | Saline: Trial 4 | Ethanol: Trial 1 | Ethanol: Trial 4 | Tol/Sens** |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(activity/min) | (activity/min) | (activity/min) | (activity/min) | (activity/min) | (activity/min) | ||
129P3/J | 26 | 61.0±3.2 | 47.8±2.2c | 27.5±1.9d | 27.7±4.3y | 17.5±2.5ax | 10.1±4.6a |
A/HeJ | 24 | 51.6±2.8 | 51.4±2.7 | 24.0±2.3d | 29.6±3.8z | 41.0±4.4ay | 38.8±5.6d |
AKR/J | 26 | 86.6±3.7 | 64.4±3.2d | 40.0±3.0d | 56.1±4.1 | 49.8±5.3 | 18.1±8.7a |
BALB/cJ | 26 | 84.0±2.4 | 68.9±2.7c | 56.5±3.5d | 50.8±7.7w | 67.5±6.7 | 29.1±10.8a |
C3H/HeJ | 24# | 29.1±2.3 | 33.4±1.6 | 27.4±1.4 | 68.9±5.4z | 39.4±5.9bw | −23.1±8.9a |
C57BL/6J | 25 | 114.2±4.7 | 78.7±4.6d | 38.7±2.6d | 58.5±6.9w | 42.4±5.3 | 23.9±9.5a |
C57L/J | 25 | 119.9±2.0 | 97.0±3.3d | 49.7±4.0d | 74.6±5.8x | 51.2±6.1b | 23.8±9.5a |
C58/J | 25 | 118.0±5.2 | 87.9±4.9d | 66.3±4.9d | 118.2±7.4y | 115.7±6.7z | 19.1±9.6 |
CBA/J | 25 | 54.3±2.8 | 55.8±2.4 | 41.3±2.2c | 65.6±6.3 | 61.1±4.2z | 9.9±7.1 |
DBA/1J | 27 | 79.2±5.6 | 74.5±3.9 | 37.4±2.1d | 51.0±7.1x | 70.1±9.0y | 56.1±11.2d |
DBA/2J | 25 | 58.5±3.8 | 60.0±3.7 | 49.9±4.5a | 39.7±6.5w | 69.3±9.0bw | 39.8±11.0b |
NZB/B1NJ | 26 | 47.9±2.3 | 34.0±2.4d | 20.2±2.3d | 21.1±4.9w | 23.0±3.7 | 15.7±6.5a |
PL/J | 22 | 63.3±1.6 | 62.2±2.4 | 42.0±2.3d | 54.1±8.6 | 49.6±7.4 | 15.7±12.2 |
SJL/J | 26 | 65.0±4.0 | 48.2±2.4b | 21.3±1.9d | 28.0±4.2y | 29.0±3.9 | 27.9±6.1d |
SWR/J | 24 | 86.2±5.9 | 51.0±4.2d | 39.9±12.9d | 68.1±8.0w | 52.1±11.1y | −5.0±7.9 |
Grand Mean | 74.9±1.6 | 61.1±1.2 | 38.8±1.3 | 53.9±2.0 | 51.9±2.0 | 20.4±2.4 | |
Heritability | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.15 |
Grid+ and Grid− groups combined
except for Habituation and Saline:Trial 1 where n = 23
d= p<.0001, c= p<.001, b= p<.01, a= p<.05, significant difference from habituation session (Saline) or Ethanol Trial 1 (Ethanol)
z= p<.0001, y= p<.001, x= p<.01, w= p<.05, significant difference from Saline on the same trial
p values based on within strain comparison between Ethanol-Saline differences on Trial 4 vs Trial 1