Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 3;39(7):743–751. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu049

Table IV.

Differences Between Children With Clefts and Their Unaffected Siblings in Academic Achievement Test Scores by Cleft Type (Cleft Lip Only, Cleft Palate Only, Cleft Lip and Palate)

Case group Reading Language Math Science Social studies Sources of information Composite Special education
Basic regression specification

N 4,129 3,605 4,356 4,164 3,006 2,965 2,749 3,929

Cleft lip only 2.00 3.43 2.98 3.33 5.22* 2.39 2.45 −0.051*
β(SE) (2.27) (3.23) (2.33) (2.81) (3.59) (3.34) (3.34) (0.026)
Cleft palate only −2.59 −4.59 0.06 1.79 −4.06 −3.87 −2.78 0.12**
β(SE) (4.13) (4.40) (3.59) (4.51) (5.08) (4.29) (4.37) (0.049)
Cleft lip with palate −0.11 −0.02 −1.09 0.23 −2.19 0.15 −0.32 0.004
β(SE) (2.61) (3.10) (2.57) (2.90) (2.96) (2.52) (2.76) (0.043)

Expanded regression specification

N 4,125 3,601 4,350 4,158 3,006 2,964 2,749 3,923

Cleft lip only 2.17 3.87 3.01 3.32 5.88* 2.87 2.96 −0.055**
β(SE) (2.11) (2.85) (2.20) (2.69) (3.42) (2.92) (2.99) (0.025)
Cleft palate only −3.84 −6.17* −0.11 1.08 −6.14 −5.81* −4.34 0.13**
β(SE) (3.94) (3.99) (3.35) (4.23) (4.60) (3.50) (3.65) (0.052)
Cleft lip with palate 0.85 2.56 0.24 1.08 −0.31 2.17 1.83 −0.009
β(SE) (2.54) (2.97) (2.53) (2.81) (2.85) (2.45) (2.60) (0.042)

Note. Two separate regression models (with the same sample size) were estimated for each outcome. The basic regression models are adjusted for child age, sex, and grade level; test version and years test had been in use. In addition to these variables, the expanded regression models were adjusted for maternal reports of prenatal smoking and alcohol use; parental age; and mother’s marital status.

*p < .1; **p < .05; ***p < .01.