Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep;7(5):193–205. doi: 10.1177/1756283X14537882

Table 2.

Phase III clinical trials of linaclotide in constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Study/phase/design Number of patients/sex/duration/doses studied Primary endpoints Efficacy results Selected secondary endpoints Efficacy results
Rao et al. [2012] N = 800 FDA endpoint* 33.6% versus 21% met the FDA endpoint (p < 0.0001) 12-week change from baseline:
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Female patients = 90.5% Three responder definitions** NNT = 7.9 Worst abdominal pain 50.1% versus 37.5% had a ≥30% reduction in abdominal pain (p = 0.0003)
12-week treatment period followed by a 4-week randomized withdrawal period (>9 of the 12 weeks of therapy) Greater proportion of linaclotide treated versus placebo treated met the three responder definitions Abdominal discomfort 48.1% versus 37% had a ≥30% reduction in abdominal discomfort (p = 0.0001)
Placebo, 290 µg linaclotide NNT range 7.6–14.3 Abdominal bloating 43.5% versus 29.9% had a ≥30% reduction in abdominal bloating (p < 0.0001)
EMA 12-week abdominal pain/discomfort endpoint Stool frequency (CSBM rate) 48.6% versus 29.6% had a ≥1 CSBM rate increase for ≥6/12 weeks (p < 0.0001)
NNT = 7.69 Stool frequency (SBM rates) 57.5% versus 29.4% had a ≥2 SBM rate increase for ≥6/12 weeks (p < 0.0001)
EMA 12-week IBS degree-of-relief endpoint BSFS stool consistency 79.4% versus 60.7% had a BSFS ≥3 (p < 0.0001)
NNT = 5.41 Severity of straining 85.3% versus 71.7% had strain score ≤3 (p < 0.0001)
Chey et al. [2012] N = 804 FDA endpoint* 33.7% versus 13.9% met the FDA endpoint (p < 0.0001) 12 week change from baseline:
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Female patients = 90% Three responder definitions** NNT = 5.1 Worst abdominal pain 48.9% versus 34.5% had a ≥30% reduction in abdominal pain (p < 0.0001) (NNT = 7)
26-week treatment period (>9 of the first 12 weeks of therapy) Greater proportion of linaclotide treated versus placebo treated met the three responder definitions Abdominal discomfort 47.6% versus 30.8% had a ≥30% reduction in abdominal discomfort (NNT = 5.9)
Placebo, 290 µg linaclotide Efficacy parameters over 26-week time period NNT range 5.2–10.3 Abdominal bloating 42.9% versus 23.8% had a ≥30% reduction in abdominal bloating (NNT = 5.2)
EMA 12-week abdominal pain/discomfort endpoint Stool frequency (CSBM rate) 47.6% versus 22.6% had a ≥1 CSBM rate increase for ≥6/12 weeks (NNT = 4)
NNT = 6.41 Stool frequency (SBM rates) 55.4% versus 27.8% had a ≥2 SBM rate increase for ≥6/12 weeks (NNT = 3.6)
EMA 26-week abdominal pain/discomfort endpoint BSFS stool consistency 80.3% versus 61.1% had a BSFS ≥3 (NNT = 5.21)
NNT = 5.68 Severity of straining 82.4% versus 70.6% had strain score ≤3 (NNT=8.48)
EMA 12-week IBS degree-of-relief endpoint 26-week change from baseline: 49.1% versus 31.3% had a ≥30% reduction in abdominal pain (p < 0.0001) (NNT = 5.6)
NNT = 4.39 Worst abdominal pain 48.1% versus 28.8% had a ≥30% reduction in abdominal discomfort (NNT = 5.2)
EMA 26-week IBS degree-of-relief endpoint Abdominal discomfort 42.4% versus 25.1% had a ≥30% reduction in abdominal bloating (NNT = 5.8)
NNT=4.93 Abdominal bloating 43.6% versus 18.6% had a ≥1 CSBM rate increase for ≥6/12 weeks (NNT = 4)
Stool frequency (CSBM rate) 49.6% versus 21.6% had a ≥2 SBM rate increase for ≥6/12 weeks (NNT = 3.6)
Stool frequency (SBM rates) 81% versus 62.1% had a BSFS ≥3 (NNT = 5.29)
BSFS stool consistency 83.5% versus 71.6% had strain score ≤3 (NNT = 8.40)
Severity of straining

BSFS, Bristol Stool Form Scale; CSBM, complete spontaneous bowel movement; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; EMA, European Medicines Agency; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; NNT, number needed to treat; SBM, spontaneous bowel movement.

*

≥30% improvement in the average daily worst abdominal pain score and increase by ≥ 1 CSBMs from baseline, occurring in the same week for at least 6 of the 12 weeks of therapy **(i) ≥ 30% improvement in abdominal pain scores, (ii) ≥ 3 CSBMs and an increase ≥ 1 CSBM from baseline, and (iii) a combined end point defined as a responder patient who met criteria for both (i) and (ii) in the same week