Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 8;2(2):95–110. doi: 10.1007/s40121-013-0010-x

Table 3.

Summary of clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure visit in the co-primary analysis populations, FOCUS and CANVAS trials [1215, 44, 47]

Trial MITTE CE
FOCUSa Clinical cure % (no. of cured/total no.) Differenceb (95% CI) Clinical cure % (no. of cured/total no.) Differenceb (95% CI)
Ceftaroline Ceftriaxone Ceftaroline Ceftriaxone
1 83.8 (244/291) 77.7 (233/300) 6.2 (−0.2, 12.6) 86.6 (194/224) 78.2 (183/234) 8.4 (1.4, 15.4)
2 81.3 (235/289) 75.5 (206/273) 5.9 (−1.0, 12.7) 82.1 (193/235) 77.2 (166/215) 4.9 (−2.5, 12.5)
1 and 2 82.6 (479/580) 76.6 (439/573) 6.0c (1.4, 10.7) 84.3 (387/459) 77.7 (349/449) 6.7c (1.6, 11.8)
Trial MITT CE
CANVASa Clinical cure % (no. cured/total no.) Differenceb (95% CI) Clinical cure % (no. cured/total no.) Differenceb (95% CI)
Ceftaroline Vanc/Az Ceftaroline Vanc/Az
1 86.6 (304/351) 85.6 (297/347) 1.0 (−4.2, 6.2) 91.1 (288/316) 93.3 (280/300) −2.2 (−6.6, 2.1)
2 85.1 (291/342) 85.5 (289/338) −0.4 (−5.8, 5.0) 92.2 (271/294)) 92.1 (269/292) 0.1 (−4.4, 4.5)
1 and 2 85.9 (595/693) 85.5 (586/685) 0.3 (−3.4, 4.0) 91.6 (559/610) 92.7 (549/592) −1.1 (−4.2, 2.0)

CE clinical efficacy population, CI confidence interval, MITT modified intent-to-treat population, MITTE modified intent-to-treat efficacy population, Vanc/Az vancomycin plus aztreonam combination

aNon-inferiority margin was set at −10% for both FOCUS and CANVAS trials

bTreatment difference: cure rate ceftaroline − cure rate comparator group

cWeighted treatment difference