Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 23.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2013 May;103(3):439–444. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.3.439

Table 2.

Impact of Others’ Testing

Attitudes on deaths Attributable to HIV Sexual behavior


Dependent variable Died
ever
HIV
(1)
Died in
last year
HIV
(2)
Relatives
died
HIV
(3)
MCP
last
year
(4)
Current
condom use
(spouse)
(5)
Recent
condom use
(any partner)(6)
Proportion of village got HIV results −12.72*** (2.892) −0.863 (0.699) −1.433 ** (0.590) −0.008 (0.107) −0.382 *** (0.132) −0.385 *** (0.132)
Dependent variable in 2004 0.129*** (0.0207) 0.162*** (0.0313) 0.304*** (0.0362) 0.290*** (0.0429) 0.280*** (0.0424) 0.237*** (0.0387)
Observations 1,991 1,989 1,984 1,995 1,995 1,995
R2 0.078 0.076 0.104 0.197 0.127 0.155
Average of dependent variable 8.852 1.971 1.455 0.194 0.225 0.267

Notes: Robust standard errors in brackets. Standard errors are clustered by village. Controls include: age, age square, HIV status in 2004, years of schooling in 2004, marital status in 2004 and a male indicator. Missing covariates are imputed with the mean of the covariate, and a missing dummy indicator is included in the set of controls. Regressions are weighted according to 2004 village size. MCP = Multiple Concurrent Partners.

***

Significant at the 1 percent level.

**

Significant at the 5 percent level.

*

Significant at the 10 percent level.