Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 25;39(7):4316–4327. doi: 10.1118/1.4729717

TABLE V.

Comparisons in algorithmic performance between TFOCS and QP-based approaches for HN case with 15 beams DASSIM-RT with respect to (1) the computational time and (2) the actual memory space required for the fluence-map optimization and (3) conformality index by CN.

  Prostate HN
  Time for fluence-map Actual memory   Time for fluence-map Actual memory  
  optimization (s) usage (GB) CN optimization (s) usage (GB) CN
TFOCS 255 0.92 0.7565 168 0.56 0.7758
QP 3911 2.54 0.7014 3597 2.41 0.7665