Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 24;4:5805. doi: 10.1038/srep05805

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) Illustration of the theoretical model where the leader A moves along smoother trajectories as the sizes of the ellipsoids increase. The hierarchical leadership network is Inline graphic. Moreover, due to the periodical boundary condition, no agent other than the leader A can completely escape the influence of others. (b), (c) The synchronization index Ja of HLN and FNR increases with the trajectory curvature η. The parameters were set as: (b) L = 2.2, r = 1.3, m = 2, d = 0.7, and ω = π/50; (c) L = 2.2, r = 0.9, m = 6, d = 0.4, and ω = π/200. The initial speed was set to 0.03L and we tested different time delays. In this model, FNN is equivalent to FNR, e.g., FNR with r = 0.9 is equal to FNN with n = 4, and FNR with r = 1.3 is equal to FNN with n = 1. Each point is the average of 200 samples around the ellipse peak. According to the synchronization index Ja, HLN outperforms FNR for large curvatures beyond a specified threshold ηc, as indicated by the vertical lines in (b) and (c). Note that the displacements in (a) do not have a unit, thus the curvatures in (b) and (c) also have no unit.