Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 24;5:375. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00375

Table 3.

Trinity and ABySS de novo assembly statistics and comparisons between the CCMP 1984 gene model sequences and the assembled contigs from CCMP 1850.

Sequences/contigs Min length Max length Mean length N50
1984 gene models 11501 150 45147 1601 2340
1850 Trinity assembly 53886 201 20608 1330.5 2148
1850 ABySS assembly 31473 150 16590 891.5 1393
vs. Trinity* vs. ABySS 1984 full genome coverage Gene models recovered**
1984 gene models 82% 76.8% 10817
1850 Trinity assembly 85.5% 95.5% 8221
1850 ABySS assembly 98.2% 95.0% 7543
*

Comparisons between the de novo assemblies were made by performing reciprocal BLAST alignments with an e-value cutoff of 1 × 10−5 (Camacho et al., 2009).

**

Coverage of the CCMP 1984 genome and gene models (Gobler et al., 2011) was tabulated with BLAST using the same parameters described above. The Gene Models Recovered column refers to the number of unique CCMP 1984 gene models found in each assembly.