Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 24.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2007 Nov;39(4):1029–1038. doi: 10.3758/bf03193001

Table 3.

Correlation Matrix of Average Translation Probability and L2 Proficiency Measures, by Direction of Translation

	1	2	3	4
	L1 to L2
1. Average probability	1
2. Immersion length	.332^*	1
3. L2 proficiency	.509^**	.380^*	1
4. L2 use	.691^**	.387^*	.610^**	1
5. L2 lexical decision d′	.608^**	.431^**	.568^**	.376^*
	L2 to L1
1. Average probability	1
2. Immersion length	n.s.	1
3. L2 proficiency	n.s.	.301^†	1
4. L2 use	n.s.	.389^*	.254^†	1
5. L2 lexical decision d′	n.s.	.416^**	.447^**	.474^**

^*

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^†

p < .1.