Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 24;49(4):1165–1183. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12148

Table 1.

Demographic and Health Characteristics of Study Sample by Whether the Patient Had a Different Diagnosing and Treating Urologist, SEER-Medicare 1995 to 2005

Individual Characteristics Unadjusted
Propensity Score Weighted*
No Change Urologist Change p-value No Change Urologist Change p-value
N (%) 15,369 (100) 8,892 (100) 8,685 (100) 8,862 (100)
Race
 White 14,071 (91.6) 8,178 (94.1) <.001 8,185 (94.2) 8,178 (94.1) .741
 Black 1,298 (8.4) 514 (5.9) 500 (5.8) 514 (5.9)
Age
 65–74 13,387 (87.1) 7,881 (90.7) <.001 7,884 (90.8) 7,881 (90.7) .766
 ≥75 1,982 (12.9) 811 (9.3) 801 (9.2) 811 (9.3)
Comorbidities
 0 5,425 (35.3) 3,297 (37.9) <.001 3,296 (37.9) 3,297 (37.9) .323
 1 5,120 (33.3) 2,938 (33.8) 2,934 (33.8) 2,938 (33.8)
 ≥2 4,824 (31.4) 2,457 (28.3) 2,455 (28.3) 2,457 (28.3)
Marital status
 Married 12,410 (80.8) 7,039 (81.0) <.001 7,028 (80.9) 7,039 (81.0) .829
 Not married 2,407 (15.7) 1,277 (14.7) 1,292 (14.9) 1,277 (14.7)
 Unknown 552 (3.6) 376 (4.3) 365 (4.2) 376 (4.3)
Median income
 Lowest 3,981 (25.9) 1,941 (22.3) <.001 1,900 (21.9) 1,941 (22.3) .884
 Middle low 4,023 (26.2) 2,102 (24.2) 2,120 (24.2) 2,102 (24.2)
 Middle high 3,899 (25.4) 2,184 (25.1) 2,160 (24.9) 2,184 (25.1)
 Highest 3,466 (22.6) 2,465 (28.4) 2,505 (28.8) 2,465 (28.4)
Grade differentiation
 Well 494 (3.2) 202 (2.3) <.001 200 (2.3) 202 (2.3) .903
 Moderately 10,187 (66.3) 5,563 (64.0) 5,630 (64.8) 5,563 (64.0)
 Poorly 4,550 (29.6) 2,864 (32.9) 2,788 (32.1) 2,864 (32.9)
 Unknown 138 (0.9) 63 (0.7) 67 (0.8) 63 (0.7)
Tumor stage
 1 4,832 (31.4) 2,643 (30.4) <.001 2,583 (29.7) 2,643 (30.4) .485
 2 9847 (64.1) 5,546 (63.8) 5,652 (65.1) 5,546 (63.8)
 3 690 (4.5) 503 (5.8) 450 (5.2) 503 (5.8)
Type of procedure
 Open prostatectomy 14,978 (97.5) 7,682 (88.4) <.001 7,919 (91.2) 7,682 (88.4) .152
 Minimally invasive prostatectomy 391 (2.5) 1,010 (11.6) 766 (8.8) 1,010 (11.6)

Note. The propensity score model included patient age, race, comorbidities, marital status, tumor grade and stage, type of procedure, area income, diagnosing physician board certification, experience, and surgical volume, treating physician experience with laparoscopic or robotic procedures, SEER-site, and diagnosis year.

*

Bivariate statistics calculated using R survey program (Lumley 2011), where propensity score weight is such that the treated individual receives a weight of 1 while control individuals are weighted by e/(1 − e), where e is the propensity score.