Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Pain. 2014 Dec;30(12):1033–1043. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000077

Table 2.

Mediation of treatment effects on parent-reported child GI symptom severity and pain at 3, 6 and 12 months by changes from baseline to 1 week post-treatment in parental threat, parental solicitousness, and child catastrophizing

a c’ b a*b Effect size of
the indirect
effect (a*b)
Parent-reported
outcome
Estimate
(SE)
90 CI 95 CI Estimate
(SE)
90 CI 95 CI Estimate
(SE)
90 CI 95 CI Estimate
(SE)
90 CI 95 CI Hedges’ g
Severity at 3 months
 Parent threat −0.18
(0.03)
−0.23,
−0.13
−0.24,
−0.12
0.01
(0.06)
−0.09,
0.11
−0.11,
0.13
0.32
(0.09)
0.17,
0.47
0.14,
0.50
−0.06
(0.02)
−0.09,
−0.03
−0.09,
−0.02
−0.43
 Parent
 solicitousness
−0.21
(0.03)
−0.26,
−0.16
−0.27,
−0.15
0.01
(0.06)
−0.09,
0.11
−0.11,
0.13
0.09
(0.10)
−0.08,
0.26
−0.11,
0.29
−0.02
(0.02)
−0.05,
0.02
−0.06,
0.02
−0.13
 Child CAT −0.12
(0.05)
−0.20,
−0.04
−0.22,
−0.02
0.01
(0.06)
−0.09,
0.11
−0.11,
0.13
0.08
(0.07)
−0.04,
0.20
−0.06,
0.22
−0.01
(0.01)
−0.02,
0.01
−0.03,
0.01
−0.15
Severity at 6 months
 Parent threat −0.18
(0.03)
−0.23,
−0.13
−0.24,
−0.12
−0.01
(0.05)
−0.09,
0.07
−0.11,
0.09
0.30
(0.07)
0.18,
0.42
0.16,
0.44
−0.05
(0.02)
−0.08,
−0.03
−0.08,
−0.02
−0.49
 Parent
 solicitousness
−0.21
(0.03)
−0.26,
−0.16
−0.27,
−0.15
−0.01
(0.05)
−0.09,
0.07
−0.11,
0.09
0.002
(0.09)
−0.15,
0.15
−0.17,
0.18
−0.0004
(0.02)
−0.03,
0.03
−0.04,
0.04
−0.003
 Child CAT −0.12
(0.05)
−0.20,
−0.04
−0.22,
−0.02
−0.01
(0.05)
−0.09,
0.07
−0.11,
0.09
−0.01
(0.06)
−0.11,
0.09
−0.13,
0.11
0.001
(0.01)
−0.01,
0.01
−0.01,
0.02
0.02
Severity at 12 months
 Parent threat −0.17
(0.03)
−0.22,
−0.12
−0.23,
−0.11
−0.001
(0.06)
−0.10,
0.10
−0.12,
0.12
0.33
(0.09)
0.18,
0.48
0.15,
0.51
−0.06
(0.02)
−0.09,
−0.03
−0.09,
−0.02
−0.44
 Parent
 solicitousness
−0.21
(0.03)
−0.26,
−0.16
−0.27,
−0.15
−0.001
(0.06)
−0.10,
0.10
−0.12,
0.12
0.14
(0.11)
−0.04,
0.32
−0.08,
0.36
−0.03
(0.02)
−0.07,
0.01
−0.08,
0.02
−0.18
 Child CAT −0.12
(0.05)
−0.20,
−0.04
−0.22,
−0.02
−0.001
(0.06)
−0.10,
0.10
−0.12,
0.12
0.03
(0.07)
−0.09,
0.15
−0.11,
0.17
−0.004
(0.01)
−0.02,
0.01
−0.02,
0.01
−0.06
Pain at 3 months
 Parent threat −0.18
(0.03)
−0.23,
−0.13
−0.24,
−0.12
−0.02
(0.19)
−0.33,
0.29
−0.39,
0.35
1.26
(0.27)
0.82,
1.71
0.73,
1.79
−0.23
(0.06)
−0.33,
−0.13
−0.35,
−0.11
−0.52
 Parent
 solicitousness
−0.21
(0.03)
−0.26,
−0.16
−0.27,
−0.15
−0.02
(0.19)
−0.33,
0.29
−0.39,
0.35
0.34
(0.32)
−0.19,
0.87
−0.29,
0.97
−0.07
(0.07)
−0.18,
0.04
−0.20,
0.06
−0.15
 Child CAT −0.12
(0.05)
−0.20,
−0.04
−0.22,
−0.02
−0.02
(0.19)
−0.33,
0.29
−0.39,
0.35
0.37
(0.21)
0.02,
0.72
−0.04,
0.78
−0.04
(0.03)
−0.10,
0.007
−0.11,
0.02
−0.20
Pain at 6 months
 Parent threat −0.18
(0.03)
−0.23,
−0.13
−0.24,
−0.12
−0.15
(0.20)
−0.48,
0.18
−0.54,
0.24
0.88
(0.29)
0.40,
1.36
0.31,
1.45
−0.16
(0.06)
−0.25,
−0.06
−0.27,
−0.04
−0.38
 Parent
 solicitousness
−0.21
(0.03)
−0.26,
−0.16
−0.27,
−0.15
−0.15
(0.20)
−0.48,
0.18
−0.54,
0.24
−0.27
(0.34)
−0.83,
0.29
−0.94,
0.40
0.06
(0.07)
−0.06,
0.18
−0.08,
0.20
0.11
 Child CAT −0.12
(0.05)
−0.20,
−0.04
−0.22,
−0.02
−0.15
(0.20)
−0.48,
0.18
−0.54,
0.24
0.03
(0.22)
−0.33,
0.39
−0.40,
0.46
−0.004
(0.03)
−0.05,
0.04
−0.06,
0.05
−0.02
Pain at 12 months
 Parent threat −0.18
(0.03)
−0.23,
−0.13
−0.24,
−0.12
0.24
(0.18)
−0.06,
0.54
−0.11,
0.59
0.87
(0.25)
0.46,
1.28
0.38,
1.36
−0.16
(0.05)
−0.24,
−0.07
−0.26,
−0.06
−0.43
 Parent
 solicitousness
−0.20
(0.03)
−0.25,
−0.15
−0.26,
−0.14
0.24 (0.18) −0.06,
0.54
−0.11,
0.59
0.32
(0.30)
−0.18,
0.82
−0.27,
0.91
−0.06
(0.06)
−0.16,
0.04
−0.18,
0.06
−0.15
 Child CAT −0.12
(0.05)
−0.20,
−0.04
−0.22,
−0.02
0.24 (0.18) −0.06,
0.54
−0.11,
0.59
0.25
(0.20)
−0.08,
0.58
−0.14,
0.64
−0.03
(0.03)
−0.07,
0.01
−0.08,
0.02
−0.16

Note.

a

= change in the mediator from baseline to post−treatment due to SLCBT treatment compared to ES;

b

= direct effect of change in the mediator from baseline to post−treatment on change in the outcome;

c’

= direct effect of treatment on the outcome variable;

a*b

=indirect (mediated) effect of treatment on the outcome. To facilitate interpretation of the table, Hedges’ g for the a*b effect was bolded if the .90 confidence intervals (CI) excluded zero, suggesting that mediation is present. Hedges’ g values can be interpreted approximately as follows: .80 large, .50 medium and .20 small.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure