Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 23;19:10.3402/meo.v19.24407. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.24407

Table 2.

Change in quality of SAGS from initial to time 2 (week 10) assessment

Time 2

Initial ‘Poor’ SAGS quality ‘Good’ SAGS quality Chi-Square
‘Poor’ SAGS quality 41 (40%) 28 (27%) 4.65 p <0.05
‘Good’ SAGS quality 0 (0%) 35 (34%)