Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 28;20(28):9549–9555. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9549

Table 1.

Comparison of eosinophilic esophagitis patients who did and did not require dilations n (%)

Characteristic No Dilation Dilation
(n = 39) (n = 22)
Age (yr) 38 (18-61) 49 (23-61)
Asthma/allergic history 12 (31) 10 (45)
Presenting symptoms 0 0
Dysphagia 15 (38) 22 (100)
Food impaction 9 (23) 10 (45)2
Reflux 9 (23) 0
No symptoms 6 (15) 0
Symptomatic 33 (85) 22 (100)
Peak eos/hpf 47.9 eos/hpf 52.6 eos/hpf
Length of follow up (yr) 4.8 ± 1.51 yr 5.2 ± 1.4 yr
Number of EGDs 1.4 ± 0.7 2.6 ± 1.5
1

Patients lost to follow up not included. ND 15 (38%) and YD 3 (14%), patients lost to follow up;

2

10 patients of 22 YD group had food impaction.