Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;5(4):167–172. doi: 10.1177/2042098614530421

Table 2.

Systematic reviews of varenicline.

Study Studies included Duration of treatment No. of
participants (varenicline)
No. of
participants (placebo)
No. of participants with events (varenicline) No. of participants with events (placebo) Outcome for serious cardiovascular adverse event: varenicline vs. placebo
Singh et al. [2011] 14 double-blind placebo-controlled RCTs Range: 7–52 weeks 4908 3308 52 27 Peto OR (95% CI) 1.72 (1.09–2.71)
Prochaska and Hilton [2012] 22 double-blind placebo-controlled RCTs Median: 12 weeks 5431 3801 34 18 Risk difference: 0.27% (−0.10% to 0.63%, p = 0.15, I 2 = 0%)
Relative risk of at least one event (14 studies): 1.40 (0.82–2.39, p = 0.22, I 2 = 0%)
Mantel-Haenszel OR: 1.41 (0.82–2.42, p = 0.22, I 2 = 0%)
Peto OR: 1.58 (0.90–2.76, p = 0.11, I 2 = 0%).
Ware et al. [2013] 15 double-blind placebo-controlled RCTs Range: 12–52 weeks 4190 2812 MACE+: 26
MACE:13
MACE+: 12
MACE: 6
MACE+:
HR: 1.951 (95% CI: 0.789–4.823)
Risk difference: 0.010 (95%CI: -0.002 to 0.022)
MACE+:
HR: 1.740 (95% CI: 0.905–3.343)
Risk difference: 0.006 (95%CI: -0.002 to 0.015)

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized controlled trial.