Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2003 Nov;87(2):241–252. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00094-4

Table 3.

Experimental group

Age STEW ELS JL JOR DUP RYB MAM DAC KAM DES TID Mean Z
5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 9 10 10
WL-Z −.579 −.774 *−2.009 *−2.132 *− 1.975 *−3.028 *− 1.975 −1.121 −0.742 *−2.962 −.833 −1.648
NWR-Z *−2.072 *−1.915 *−2.793 *−4.257 −1.450 *−3.095 *−1.998 −.327 −1.196 *−3.096 .885 −1.938
ISR-Z −1.370 −.449 *−5.394 *−5.394 *−2.143 *−2.143 −.564 *−2.722 −1.371 *−3.719 −.858 −2.375
LEITER-Z −.533 .667 −.467 1.133 1.400 −.533 −.333 .467 *−2.533 −.400 −.113
PPVT-Z −1.533 .067 −.600 .533 −.333 −.133 −1.267 −.200 *−1.667 .667 −.447
CELF-RS-Z −1.333 −.333 *−2.333 −.333 −1.000 −1.000 .333 −1.333 *−1.667 1.000 −.800
CELF-OD-Z −.333 *− 1.667 −1.333 *−2.000 −.333 *−2.333 −.667 −.667 *−2.000 .333 −1.100
CELF-FS-Z −1.000 −1.000 *−2.333 *−2.333 −1.333 *−2.000 −1.333 −1.333 *−2.000 2.333 −1.233

Comparison of z-scores in performance on experimental tasks in the present study with z-scores in performance on a variety of standardized tests. Scores on the standardized tests were previously reported in MacWhinney et al. (2000), except for one child (JL), for whom these data were not available.