Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):157–166. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318278908a

TABLE 3.

Experience and Attitudes Regarding Emergency Research and Trauma as a Function of Trauma Community Subgroups

Variable Patient (n = 172), n (%) Family (n = 73), n (%) Community (n = 64), n (%) p
Previous participation in clinical research 36 (21) 14 (19) 16 (24) 0.694
Given permission for others to participate in clinical research 10 (6) 3 (4) 4 (6) 0.830
If you were a victim of trauma and could not consent, who would you want to consent for you to participate in emergency research?
 Family member 160 (93) 70 (96) 60 (94) 0.039
 Community leader/member 10 (6) 2 (3) 0 (0)
 Religious leader 2 (1) 1 (1) 4 (6)
If your family were not available, who would be the best person to consent for you to participate in emergency research?
 Family member* 13 (8) 2 (3) 18 (28) <0.001
 Community leader/member* 6 (3) 3 (4) 10 (16)
 Religious leader* 20 (12) 5 (7) 29 (45)
 Friend 19 (11) 12 (16) 5 (8)
 Doctor* 57 (33) 30 (41) 1 (2)
 Responsible person 5 (3) 1 (1) 1 (2)
 Nobody, it would not be right for someone other than my family to consent for me to participate in this type of research even if it could potentially be helpful to me or save my life.* 52 (30) 20 (27) 0 (0)
Have you or someone you know experienced trauma resulting in significant blood loss and the need for blood transfusions?
 Yes 70 (41) 33 (45 27 (43) 0.369
 No 102 (59) 40 (55) 36 (57)
Trauma, such as injuries related to violence or accidents, is a serious concern in my community.
 Strongly disagree 2 (1) 0 (0) 3 (5) 0.026
 Disagree* 11 (6) 2 (3) 0 (0)
 Neutral 13 (8) 4 (5) 3 (5)
 Agree 88 (51) 32 (44) 25 (39)
 Strongly agree* 58 (34) 35 (48) 33 (52)
More research that could benefit trauma patients should be performed.
 Strongly disagree 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.003
 Disagree 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Neutral 2 (1) 3 (4) 3 (5)
 Agree* 117 (68) 38 (52) 27 (42)
 Strongly agree* 53 (31) 32 (44) 34 (53)
Do you think the AVERT Shock Trial is an important study for us to perform?
 Yes 166 (96) 72 (99) 61 (95) 0.279
 No 3 (2) 1 (1) 0 (0)
 Undecided 3 (2) 0 (0) 3 (5)

χ2 test was used to evaluate significance of variables between groups. Significance further analyzed with pairwise comparisons reported at p < 0.05 following z test of proportions with Bonferroni correction.

*

Patient versus community.

Family versus community.

Patient versus family.