Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jan;143(1):31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.007

Table I.

Comparison of baseline characteristics across the 3 treatment arms*

Treatment group
MI Paste Plus (n = 34) PreviDent fluoride varnish (n = 40) Home care (n = 41) All (n = 115)
Age (y) 14.6 (1.4) 14.4 (1.5) 14.3 (1.5) 14.4 (1.5)
Female 15 (44%) 23 (58%) 21 (51%) 59 (51%)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white 19 (56%) 23 (58%) 25 (61%) 67 (58%)
 Other or multiple race 6 (18%) 3 (8%) 4 (10%) 13 (11%)
 Unreported 9 (26%) 14 (35%) 12 (29%) 35 (30%)
Number of teeth affected by WSL (1–4) 3.3 (1.0) 3.2 (0.9) 3.2 (1.1) 3.2 (1.0)
Initial surface area affected by WSL (%) 11.8 (8.6) 11.2 (6.2) 11.5 (9.6) 11.5 (8.2)
Oral hygiene level (based on latest toothbrushing and flossing habits) (%)
 Good 3 (9%) 2 (5%) 5 (12%) 10 (9%)
 Fair 15 (44%) 18 (45%) 14 (34%) 47 (41%)
 Poor 16 (47%) 20 (50%) 22 (54%) 58 (50%)
Weeks from orthodontic appliance removal to enrollment
 Mean (SD) 1.03 (1.8) 0.93 (1.7) 1.5 (2.3) 1.2 (2.0)
 ≤1 week (%) 24 (71%) 31 (78%) 27 (66%) 82 (71%)
Weeks from baseline to follow-up photograph 9.5 (4.6) 9.6 (3.0) 11.0 (6.8) 10.1 (5.1)
*

For the continuous variables, the values reported are means (and standard deviations). For categorical variables, count (%).