Table 4.

Hierarchical Regression Analyses Testing Additive and Moderation Models of the Influence of Income, Status, and Paternal Emotion Coaching to Child Self-Regulation

Contributions of Child Status, Income, and Paternal Coaching to Child Behavior Regulation
Variables	R2	Adj R2	Δ R2	β	β
1. Status	.57	.55	.57***	1.13	.61***
Income				.22	.31**
2. Coach-P	.59	.55	.01	.007	.006
3. CoachPXStatus	.60	.55	.006	−.01	−.76
Contributions of Child Status, Income, and Paternal Coaching to Child Emotion Regulation
1. Status	.19	.15	.19*	.39	.39*
Income				.05	.12
2. Coach-P	.22	.16	.03	.006	.18
3. CoachPXStatus	.24	.16	.02	−.009	−1.16
Contributions of Child Status and Paternal Coaching to Child Attention Regulation
1. Status	.20	.18	.20**	.28	.45**
2. Coach-P	.39	.36	.19**	.009	.45**
3. CoachPXStatus	.40	.40	.01	−.005	−1.02

Adj R² = Adjusted R², Δ R² = change in R², β= unstandardized regression coefficients, β = Standardized regression coefficients, Status = children’s social status = aggressive/rejected or low aggressive/popular, Coach-P = Paternal Emotion Coaching. CoachPXStatus = interaction of paternal coaching and child status.

⁺p < .10

^*p < .05

^**p <.01

^***< .001.