Table 2.
Method | x 1 | x 2 | x 3 | x 4 | x 5 | x 1 x 2 | x 1 x 3 | x l x 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Lasso | 22% | 100% | 100% | 18% | 25% | 15% | 12% | 15% |
adaptive Lasso | 6% | 100% | 100% | 3% | 7% | 2% | 4% | 1% | |
proposed method | 5% | 100% | 100% | 4% | 6% | 5% | 5% | 0% | |
| |||||||||
Model 2 | Lasso | 6% | 91% | 91% | 6% | 5% | 2% | 6% | 3% |
adaptive Lasso | 2% | 87% | 85% | 4% | 4% | 1% | 2% | 1% | |
proposed method | 10% | 98% | 99% | 11% | 8% | 10% | 10% | 1% |
Method | x 1 x 5 | x 2 x 3 | x 2 x 4 | x 2 x 5 | x 3 x 4 | x 3 x 5 | x 4 x 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Lasso | 15% | 100% | 13% | 13% | 11% | 13% | 15% |
adaptive Lasso | 2% | 100% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 0% | |
proposed method | 1% | 100% | 4% | 6% | 4% | 6% | 0% | |
| ||||||||
Model 2 | Lasso | 3% | 89% | 4% | 3% | 9% | 5% | 2% |
adaptive Lasso | 2% | 82% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 0% | 0% | |
proposed method | 1% | 97% | 10% | 8% | 11% | 8% | 2% |