Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 25;114(2):399–411. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu064

Table 3.

Three-way ANOVA for analyses of differences in photosynthetic carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of offspring ramets with ‘integration’, ‘nitrogen form’ and ‘water status’ as main factors

Effect df Photosynthesis
Conductance
Ci
F P F P F P
Integration 1 6·731 0.012 10·831 0.002 0·335 0·566
Nitrogen 1 1·981 0·165 1·500 0·226 0·134 0·716
Water 1 15·469 <0.001 21·077 <0.001 0·302 0·585
Integration × nitrogen 1 0·179 0·674 0·204 0·653 0·055 0·815
Integration × water 1 3·211 0·079 2·772 0·102 2·277 0·138
Nitrogen × water 1 0·910 0·345 1·150 0·289 1·409 0·241
Integration × nitrogen × water 1 0·010 0·919 0·002 0·966 0·272 0·605
Error 50

See Fig. 3 for data.

Significant effects (P < 0·05) are shown in bold type.