Table 1.

Cued-recollection test: Correct Responses and Latencies to Targets and Lures

	Mean Proportion		Response Latencies (s)
	Younger	Older	Younger	Older
Target Hits (total)	.85 (80.9)	.78 (73.6)	2.37	2.65
“Strong” hits	.39 (37.6)	.37 (35.7)	2.20	2.45
“Weak” hits	.45 (43.3)	.40 (37.9)	2.52	2.91
Lure Correct Rejections	.90 (28.6)	.71 (22.2)	2.28	3.07

Note. Targets were verbal descriptions that had been studied with pictures of varying durations, whereas lures were descriptions that had been studied without a picture. Recollection detail ratings of “3” were coded as strong recollections and ratings of “2” or “1” were coded as weak recollections (i.e., target hits or lure false alarms); ratings of “0” were coded as no recollection (i.e., target misses or lure correct rejections). The average number of observations is included in parentheses.