Table 2. Assessment of Quality of Methodology of the Studies Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.
Author | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Total score |
Robman [15] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
Ishida [11] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Kalayoglu [10] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Miller [14] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Klein [31] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
Haas [32] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Shen D [35] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Turgut [33] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Khandhadia [34] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
‘Y’ denotes ‘yes’ and ‘N’ denotes ‘no’. Quality items: 1) Definition of case; 2) Representativeness of the cases; 3) Selection of Controls; 4) Definition of Controls; 5) Study control for age; 6) Study controls for smoking; 7) Ascertainment of exposure; 8) Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls; 9) Non-response rate.