Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar 27;64(2):204–213. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.02.013

Table 4.

Incidence rates and HRs of ESRD as a function of dietary pattern scores.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Per 1-U increase in pattern score
Convenience
No. of events 44 38 39 20
IR 6.81 (5.07, 9.15) 6.17 (4.48, 8.46) 6.25 (4.56, 8.56) 3.09 (1.99, 4.79)
HR Model 1 1.00 (reference) 0.95 (0.61, 1.47) 1.07 (0.69, 1.67) 0.60 (0.34, 1.08) 0.91 (0.72, 1.14)
HR Model 2 1.00 (reference) 1.37 (0.87, 2.16) 1.31 (0.83, 2.06) 0.73 (0.41, 1.31) 1.01 (0.81, 1.26)
Plant Based
No. of events 44 34 31 32
IR 6.97 (5.19, 9.36) 5.35 (3.82, 7.50) 4.88 (3.43, 6.94) 5.05 (3.57, 7.14)
HR Model 1 1.00 (reference) 0.76 (0.48, 1.19) 0.74 (0.46, 1.19) 0.86 (0.52, 1.41) 1.09 (0.89, 1.32)
HR Model 2 1.00 (reference) 1.08 (0.67, 1.75) 0.74 (0.45, 1.23) 1.18 (0.71, 1.98) 1.19 (0.97, 1.48)
Sweets/Fats
No. of events 45 32 40 24
IR 7.17 (5.35, 9.61) 5.07 (3.58, 7.16) 6.32 (4.63, 8.62) 3.73 (2.50, 5.57)
HR Model 1 1.00 (reference) 0.88 (0.56, 1.39) 1.36 (0.86, 2.15) 0.99 (0.54, 1.82) 1.09 (0.87, 1.37)
HR Model 2 1.00 (reference) 0.89 (0.55, 1.45) 1.29 (0.79, 2.09) 0.99 (0.52, 1.93) 1.15 (0.87, 1.51)
Southern
No. of eents 20 36 43 42
IR 3.12 (2.01, 4.83) 5.81 (4.19, 8.05) 6.67 (4.94, 8.98) 6.69 (4.95, 9.06)
HR Model 1 1.00 (reference) 1.35 (0.78, 2.37) 1.30 (0.74, 2.28) 1.25 (0.68, 2.30) 1.27 (1.04, 1.56)
HR Model 2 1.00 (reference) 1.40 (0.79, 2.47) 1.02 (0.58, 1.79) 0.73 (0.38, 1.42) 0.94 (0.76, 1.17)
Alcohol/Salads
No. of events 42 44 33 22
IR 6.56 (4.85, 8.88) 7.12 (5.30, 9.57) 5.17 (3.67, 7.27) 3.44 (2.27, 5.23)
HR Model 1 1.00 (reference) 1.14 (0.74, 1.75) 0.91 (0.57, 1.45) 0.73 (0.42, 1.26) 0.87 (0.72, 1.07)
HR Model 2 1.00 (reference) 1.04 (0.67, 1.63) 1.19 (0.74, 1.94) 0.88 (0.50, 1.53) 0.95 (0.76, 1.19)

Note: Unless otherwise indicated, values given as IR of ESRD per 1,000 person-years of follow-up (95% CI) and HR of ESRD (95% CI). For each pattern, Q1 represents least consistency with pattern whereas Q4 represents most consistency with pattern. Model 1 is adjusted for age, gender, race, geographic region of residence, and energy intake. Model 2 is adjusted for variables in Model 1 plus lifestyle factors (self-reported frequency of exercise per week, current smoking), comorbidities (history of heart disease and hypertension), educational achievement (< vs. ≥ high school diploma), annual family income (< vs. ≥ $20,000/y), and natural log-transformed urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Abbreviations: ESRD, end-stage renal disease; Q, quartile; IR, incidence rate; HR, hazard ratio.