Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Q. 2013 May 16;95(1):221–238. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12039

Table 2.

Ordered logistic models of SRH on select predictors, NHIS 1997–2009 (N=76,636).

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Education (ref.=HS diploma)
HS dropouts 2.14*** 2.05*** 1.56*** 1.45***
GED 1.96*** 1.88*** 1.55*** 1.39***
Control variables
Age 1.04*** 1.04*** 1.03*** 1.03***
Female 1.11*** 1.12*** 0.90*** 0.92***
Race/ethnicity (ref.=NH white)
 Black 1.57*** 1.38*** 1.17*** 1.17***
 Hispanic 1.12*** 1.14*** 1.06 1.09*
 Other 1.39*** 1.36*** 1.19** 1.12
Year of interview 1.03*** 1.03*** 1.03*** 1.02***
Marital status (ref.=married)
 Widowed 1.20*** 0.88*** 0.88***
 Divorced 1.41*** 1.24*** 1.22***
 Never married 1.48*** 1.17*** 1.18***
 Unknown 1.03 0.85* 0.88
Region (ref.=South)
 Northeast 0.84*** 0.86*** 0.87***
 North Central 0.94** 0.96 0.95*
 West 0.82*** 0.81*** 0.84***
Health insurance (ref.=insured)
 Uninsured 1.10*** 0.90*** 0.91***
 Unknown 1.17 0.99 1.02
Economic factors
Family income 0.80*** 0.82***
Employment (ref.=employed)
 Unemployed 1.29*** 1.27***
 Not in LF 2.79*** 2.71***
 Unknown 0.98 1.06
Body weight (ref=not obese)
 Obese 1.88***
 Unknown 1.51***
Smoking (ref.=never smoked)
 Past smoker 1.23***
 Current smoker 1.72***
 Unknown 1.19
Alcohol use (ref.=current use)
 Never 1.20***
 Former 1.48***
 Unknown 1.09
Cutpoints
1 −1.03 −0.97 −1.81 −1.22
2 0.44 0.51 −0.25 0.37
3 1.99 2.08 1.46 2.13
4 3.52 3.62 3.11 3.81
*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001

When we re-estimate these models with GED as the omitted education category, the results show that HS dropouts have 9% higher odds of ‘worse’ health than GED recipients in Models 1 and 2 (p<.01); there are no significant difference between GEDs and dropouts in Models 3 and 4.