Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Genet. 2010 Jun 24;47(10):677–685. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.073775

Table 3.

Dominant and Recessive Models of Log-Linear Analysis of TCblR Variants

Republic of Ireland United Kingdom
Variant Dom
RR*
Dom
p-value
Rec
RR
Rec
p-value
Dom
RR
Dom
p-value
Rec
RR
Rec
p-value
rs4147651
 Case 1.1048 0.4329 0.7598 0.3496 FTC** FTC 0.6830 0.3386
 Mother 1.0342 0.5795 0.5868 0.1055 0.9765 0.5303 1.0637 0.8976
rs7408841
 Case FTC FTC 1.3588 0.0824 1.2350 0.2127 1.0259 0.9091
 Mother FTC FTC 0.8482 0.4135 1.1464 0.3378 0.8033 0.3594
rs2232775
 Case FTC FTC 6.000 0.0086 0.7965 0.4081 FTC FTC
 Mother FTC FTC 0.4567 0.3357 0.8394 0.1738 FTC FTC
rs2927707
 Case 1.0561 0.6148 0.7133 0.1091 0.9483 0.7146 0.9659 0.9014
 Mother FTC FTC 1.2461 0.3263 0.9582 0.6013 0.8331 0.4988
E88del
 Case 1.3405 0.7462 FTC FTC ND*** ND ND ND
 Mother FTC FTC FTC FTC ND ND ND ND
rs2336573
 Case FTC FTC 6.5871 0.0037 0.7064 0.2550 FTC FTC
 Mother FTC FTC 0.2469 0.1858 0.7518 0.1386 FTC FTC
rs2227288
 Case 1.0210 0.8971 0.6856 0.4932 0.8320 0.3962 0.4258 0.2315
 Mother FTC FTC 2.6990 0.2006 0.8055 0.5434 0.4428 0.3369
rs250511
 Case 0.7980 0.2625 FTC FTC ND ND ND ND
 Mother FTC FTC FTC FTC ND ND ND ND
rs9426
 Case FTC FTC 6.7127 0.0035 ND ND ND ND
 Mother FTC FTC 0.2471 0.1656 ND ND ND ND
rsl73665
 Case 0.7253 0.1313 FTC FTC 0.9480 0.8021 0.7332 0.7084
 Mother FTC FTC FTC FTC FTC FTC 2.4150 0.4509
rs250508
 Case 0.8428 0.1861 1.2416 0.1621 ND ND ND ND
 Mother 0.9832 0.6401 0.7748 0.1239 ND ND ND ND
*

RR for the Recessive Model is the risk of disease with 2 copies divided by risk of disease with 0 or 1 copy; RR for the Dominant Model is the risk of disease with 1 or 2 copies divided by risk of disease with 0 copies.

**

FTC = Failure to converge

***

ND = not done

Note: none of the reported p-values are <0.05 upon correction for multiple tests (permutation)