Table 2.
Requirements for accuracy
|
Data import, data registration and structure contouring | ||
|---|---|---|
| Minimal | Enhanced | Optimal |
| Import of external CT, MRI or PET data |
Registration of any number of data sets |
Flexible registration between CT and CT |
| Automatic rigid registration of 2 different data sets (e.g. CT and MRI) based on grey scale values |
Automatic registration error measured in a phantom ≤ 0.5 mm |
Flexible registration between different data sets |
| Registration of the planned CT with a combined PET-CT |
Propagation of a structure to any registered data set |
Flexible registration variable selectable in both directions |
| Automatic registration error measured in a phantom ≤ 1 mm |
The propagated structure automatically receives a new name and / or a specific index |
Automatic registration error measured in a phantom ≤ 0.2 mm |
| Structures can be copied to both sides between rigid registered data sets |
Correction tools for example to cleanup pixels out of a selected VOI |
Structures can be copied to both sides between flexible registered data sets |
| Structure from one dataset is representable in all registered data sets |
|
|
| Boolian operations (AND, OR, NOT) |
|
|
| Automatic expansion and contraction of structures with margins selectable in all three-dimensional directions |
|
|
| Density override |
|
|
|
Requirements for treatment planning | ||
|
Minimal |
Enhanced |
Optimal |
| Conventional IMRT possible (step-and-shoot or sliding-window IMRT) |
Volumetric IMRT possible (e.g. RapidArc or VMAT) |
Volumetric IMRT with more than one arc and selectable segments |
| Create sum of treatment plans calculated on one data set |
Direct manual manipulation of the fluences possible |
Biological optimization and calculation |
| Use of more than one isocenter in one treatment plan |
IMRT optimization with a DVH based declaration of the constrains |
Flattening filter free mode planning |
| Non-coplanar fields are applicable (even for IMRT) |
Dose and field entries and exits presentable on the body contour |
Create sum of treatment plans calculated on flexible registered data sets |
| Display option of a structure in the BEV (e.g. for adjustment of saturation fields) |
Reference dose can be applied to the treatment plan without linking to an anatomic location of the data set |
Fit of isodoses to PTV or OAR by dragging the isodoses |
| Possibility of using a treatment plan as a base dose plan for a new optimization |
TCP and NTCP model calculation included |
|
| Convert an isodose to a structure |
|
|
| Calculation and export of dose matrices (fluence) in transversal, sagittal and coronar slices |
|
|
| Transfer of the fluence distribution on any CT data set and any phantom for the physical verification of dose |
|
|
| Adjustable calculation grid |
|
|
|
Requirements for patient verification | ||
|
Minimal |
Enhanced |
Optimal |
| 2D fluoroscopic images and CBCT images producible in the treatment room directly before any fraction |
|
|
| Fast execution, high solution, good clinical image quality |
|
|
| Image overlay between the DRR of the treatment plan and the verification images (2D planar images) |
|
|
| Image overlay between the CT slices of the treatment plan and the verification images (CBCT) |
|
|
| Automatic matching and manual matching possible | ||