Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 21;20(27):8898–8909. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.8898

Table 7.

Quality of evidence supporting different pharmacologic agents for constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and chronic constipation

Pharmacologic agent Quality of evidence for IBS-C Quality of evidence for CC
Laxatives
Psyllium No RCTs Moderate
Docusate sodium No RCTs Low
Lactulose No RCTs Moderate
PEG Moderate High
Senna No RCTs Low
Bisacodyl No RCTs Moderate
Prokinetics
Prucalopride No RCTs High
Naronapride No RCTs Low
Velusetrag Low Low
Rose-010 Moderate No RCTs
Secretagogues
Lubiprostone High High
Linaclotide High High
Plecanatide Low Low
Bile acid modulators
CDC Low Low
Elobixibat No RCTs Moderate

The quality of evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system[86], which defines study quality as high (further research is very unlikely to change confidence in the estimated effect); moderate (further research is likely to have an important impact on confidence in the estimated effect and may change the estimate); low (further research is very likely to have an important impact on confidence in the estimated effect and is likely to change the estimate); or very low (any estimate of effect is very uncertain). CC: Chronic constipation; CDC: Chenodeoxycholate; IBS-C: Constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome; PEG: Polyethylene glycol; RCT: Randomized controlled trials.