Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Apr 2;63(6):1007–1018. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.436

Fig 2.

Fig 2

The performance of the CKD-EPI or the MDRD Study equation vs. the alternative equations

Difference in P30 (upper panels) and the mean absolute error (lower panels) of the CKD-EPI or the MDRD Study equation and the alternative equations along with their 99.6 % CIs are shown. For the metric of P30, a difference of >0 indicates that CKD-EPI or the MDRD Study equation is superior to the alternative equations. For mean absolute error, a difference of <0 indicates that the CKD-EPI or the MDRD Study equation has a lower mean absolute error than the alternative equations. P values for all pair wise comparisons with the CKD-EPI or the MDRD Study equation are < 0.004.

*Equations that had transplant recipients in the development cohort

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure