Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 28;9(7):e103301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103301

Figure 3. Influence of the organ-tissue scaling exponent Inline graphic on an organ-tissue’s contribution to the positive y-intercept and to REE in linear models.

Figure 3

Panel A depicts the contribution to the y-intercept by the i-th individual organ-tissue REE in terms of Inline graphic, where Inline graphic is the value of total body mass about which the Taylor linearization is performed. The contribution to the y-intercept is expressed as a multiplier of Inline graphic calculated as Inline graphic. The individual organ-tissue’s contribution to the y-intercept is maximized given a fixed numerical value of Inline graphic when Inline graphic is ∼0.70 for an animal with Inline graphic  = 30 g, as predicted by Eq. 12. Importantly, there is a substantial range of Inline graphic values that more than double Inline graphic. Panel B depicts the hypothetical effect of varying the Inline graphic value on both the y-intercept and slope of the hypothetical liver REE – Inline graphic relationship assuming that the allometric scaling coefficient Inline graphic remains fixed at 0.36Inline graphic (rescaled from 22.6 Inline graphic, the value reported by [27] and depicted in Figure 2A). Note that the sensitivity of the slope to variation in Inline graphic suggests that group differences in the Inline graphic of the liver, a small organ with a big impact on whole-body REE, could contribute to the problem of differing between-group slopes of whole-body REE in phenotyping studies.