Investigating How Implementation Intentions Improve Non-Focal Prospective Memory Tasks

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Conscious Cogn. 2014 Jun 12;27:213–230. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.003

Exp.		Condition			Standard v II		Standard v PMI		II v PMI

		Standard	II	PMI	G²(1)	p	G²(1)	p	G²(1)	p
1	C₁	.72 [.68, .77]	.77 [.73, .82]	72 [.67, .77]	1.91	.16	.002	.96	2.01	.16
1	C₂	.86 [.82, .89]	.87 [.83, .90]	.87[.84, .91]	0.24	.63	0.33	.57	0.007	.93
2	C₁	.71 [.67, .75]	.76 [.72, .79]	-	3.19	.07	-		-
2	C₂	.88 [.86, .91]	.90 [.87, .92]	-	0.41	.52	-		-
3	C₁	.81 [.78, .83]	.80 [.77, .82]	-	0.25	.61	-		-
3	C₂	.90 [.89, .92]	.91 [.89, .93]	-	0.50	.48	-		-

Note: Standard = standard PM instructions. II = Implementation intention instructions. PMI = importance of PM task is emphasized. Numbers in brackets indicate bounds of 95% confidence intervals.