Table 4.
Positive Affect (PA)
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Mean β (SE) | p | BS var. α (SE) | p | WS var. τ (SE) | p |
Intercept | 1.74 (0.10) | <.001 | −1.10 (0.15) | <.001 | −0.48 (0.14) | .001 |
Mean hourly leisure-time MVPA | 0.01 (0.03) | .621 | −0.09 (0.04) | .018 | ||
BS var. in scale | 0.42 (0.14) | .003 | ||||
Covariance (mean and WS var) | −0.15 (0.06) | .009 |
Negative Affect (NA)
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Mean β (SE) | p | BS var. α (SE) | p | WS var. τ (SE) | p |
Intercept | 0.42 (0.05) | <.001 | −2.44 (0.16) | < .001 | −1.50 (0.09) | < .001 |
Mean hourly leisure-time MVPA | −0.03 (0.01) | .057 | −0.06 (0.02) | .011 | ||
BS var. in scale | †† | †† | ||||
Covariance (mean and WS var) | †† | †† |
Feeling energetic
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Mean β (SE) | p | BS var. α (SE) | p | WS var. τ (SE) | p |
Intercept | 1.32 (0.09) | <.001 | −1.48 (0.16) | <.001 | −0.19 (0.08) | .014 |
Mean hourly leisure-time MVPA | 0.01 (0.02) | .535 | −0.002(0.02) | .909 | ||
BS var. in scale | 0.08 (0.03) | .011 | ||||
Covariance (mean and WS var) | −0.01 (0.02) | .743 |
Feeling tired
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Mean β (SE) | p | BS var. α (SE) | p | WS var. τ (SE) | p |
Intercept | 0.82 (0.06) | <.001 | −2.10 (0.17) | <.001 | −0.56 (0.14) | <.001 |
Mean hourly leisure-time MVPA | −0.01 (0.02) | .687 | −0.02(0.03) | .489 | ||
BS var. in scale | 0.53 (0.13) | <.001 | ||||
Covariance (mean and WS var) | 0.20 (0.04) | <.001 |
Note. N = 119. BS = Between-subjects. WS = Within-subjects.
The model with the addition of the random scale estimate (BS var. in scale) and estimate of covariance between random scale and location (mean and WS var) did not converge due to a lack of variance in the dependent variable.