Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2014 Feb 26;390(1):51–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.02.019

Table 2.

Summarized cell counts for Efnb2 CKO and Rbpj CKO mutant and control samples.

Strain/Stage Controla (mean;sd) Mutant (mean;sd) % change
Efnb2 CKO
E14.5(n = 12)b total nuclei c 2719; 363 2396; 338 * −11.9
Foxi1+ nuclei 797; 208 603; 116 * −14.1
Foxi1+ densityd 290; 50 255; 51 ns
E19 (n = 4) total nuclei 7645; 1344 5842; 525 ns
Foxi1+ nuclei 1942; 372 1548; 69 ns
Foxi1+ density 241; 26 268; 31 ns
Rbpj CKO
E15.5 (n = 6) total nuclei 4313; 332 1717; 158 ** − 60.2
Foxi1+ nuclei 667; 167 575; 96 Ns
Foxi1+ density 153; 31 335; 46 ** + 118.4
a

Controls were Efnb2+/flox or Foxg1-Cre+;Rbpj+/flox

b

Refers to equally sized control and mutant samples

c

Refers to total number of DAPI+ nuclei within the domain of Foxi1 protein expression

d

Number of Foxi1+ nuclei per 1000 DAPI+ nuclei

Differences assessed by unpaired t-tests. Two-tailed values of

*

P < 0.05 and

**

P < 0.0001.

Non-significance (ns) was set at P > 0.05.