Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 18;11(7):7376–7392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110707376

Table A1.

Univariable associations between reported delivery and aesthetic conditions and measured water quality in a sample of households of three rural counties in Alabama 2012.

Reported delivery and aesthetic conditions Presence of total coliforms in kitchen samples
OR (95%CI)
Presence of total coliforms in outside samples
OR (95%CI)
Presence of free chlorine
OR (95%CI)
Presence of total chlorine
OR (95%CI)
Turbidity > 0.3 NTU
OR (95%CI)
Log-transformed Pressure Quintiles * OR (95% CI)
Intermittent Service 1.12 (0.64–1.95) 0.92 (0.54–1.56) 2.25 (0.53–9.63) 0.81 (0.17–3.76) 1.36 (0.93–1.99) 0.89 (0.59–1.34)
Low Water Pressure 0.89 (0.58–1.37) 0.71 (0.49–1.06) 1.04 (0.49–2.21) 2.94 (0.63–13.34) 0.78 (0.59–1.04) 1.43 (1.10–1.85)
Objectionable Taste 0.75 (0.44–1.26) 0.85 (0.54–1.34) 1.00 (0.42–2.37) 0.42 (0.13–1.33) 0.98 (0.70–1.36) 1.11 (0.82–1.49)
Objectionable Odor 1.00 (0.59–1.70) 1.11 (0.70–1.76) 0.94 (0.38–2.33) 0.31 (0.10–0.99) 1.02 (0.72–1.46) 0.95 (0.68–1.32)
Objectionable Color 1.41 (0.86–2.31) 1.27 (0.81–2.01) 1.46 (0.50–4.24) 1.07 (0.23–4.93) 0.78 (0.54–1.12) 0.97 (0.70–1.35)

Note: * Ordinal logistic regression performed on quintiles of log-transformed pressure. Odds ratios derived from modeling the probability of being in a lower level of pressure are reported; Logistic regression performed on binary pressure when proportional odds assumption was not met; Statistically significant results in bold.