Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Dec 10;2(1):23–34. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70172-4

Table 3.

Health impacts and cost of expanded access to key populations over 20 years, compared to 2010 eligibility guidelines and status quo health access (all costs in 2012 US dollars)

Percent of
infections
averteda
DALYs
averted
(000s)b
Additional
cost
(millions)c
ICERd
India
Belgaum
FSW, status quo access 13% 3.5 $0.2 $85
all HIV+, status quo access 21% 9.0 $1.6 $268
all HIV+, prioritised FSW 29% 11.0 $2.3 $395
all HIV+, universal access 52% 33.8 $123.9 $5,648

Belgaum, no condom
FSW, status quo access 1% 0.9 $0.1 $73
all HIV+, status quo access 1% 2.2 $0.5 --
all HIV+, prioritised FSW 41% 37.6 $4.0 $123
all HIV+, universal access 66% 108.9 $138.7 $2,054

Vietnam
Prevtool
FSW, status quo access 2% 41.5 $5.9 $161
MSM, status quo access 5% 146.2 $37.1 --
PWID, status quo access 5% 149.1 $36.8 --
CD4 ≤500, status quo access 4% 175.6 $47.5 --
all HIV+, status quo access 12% 367.1 $96.4 $305
CD4 ≤500, prioritised FSW, MSM, PWID 30% 1497.5 $2,442.6 --
all HIV+, prioritised FSW, MSM, PWID 52% 2082.5 $2,485.7 $1,586
CD4 ≤500, universal access 37% 2544.5 $25,692.5 --
all HIV+, universal access 63% 3278.2 $25,725.4 $21,550
a

Percentage of infections averted over 20 years compared to CD4 ≤350 cells/µL eligibility with status quo access (undiscounted).

b

Cumulative disability-adjusted life-years averted compared to CD4 ≤350 cells/µL eligibility with status quo access (undiscounted).

c

Cumulative additional cost over 20 years compared to CD4 ≤350 cells/µL eligibility with status quo access (undiscounted).

d

Incremental cost per DALY averted over 20 years relative to previous undominated strategy, ‘--‘ indicates a dominated strategy (either weak or strong). Costs and health outcomes discounted at 3% per annum.