Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 29;9(7):e102429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102429

Table 3. Correlations between IMS indicators for ILI and RSV activity vs traditional influenza surveillance datasets maintained by the CDC.

IMS-ILI indicator and: IMS RSV indicator and CDC RSV activity
Outcome CDC-ILI CDC influenza viral activity CDC RSV activity
Weekly incidence 0.97 (1) 0.93 (0) 0.33 (0)* 0.94 (0)
Peak week 0.99 0.97 0.21 0.97
Intensity 0.90 āˆ’0.10 0.43 0.77

Correlation between IMS-ILI and CDC RSV laboratory-confirmed viral activity can be considered as a control comparison testing the specificity of IMS-ILI for influenza surveillance. Analyses performed at the national scale, 2003ā€“04 to 2009ā€“10. Values indicate Pearson correlation coefficients; values in bold are significant (P<0.05).

*Correlation for this control comparison is significantly weaker than for the other comparisons (Pā‰¤ 0.05), indicating that the IMS-ILI indicator is specific of weekly influenza activity while the IMS RSV indicator is specific of weekly RSV activity.