Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 29;9(7):e103641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103641

Table 2. Pairwise comparisons between replicate systems for RAS and AS separately, based on DGGE and 454 pyrosequencing data sets.

Statistical test Analytical Method D00 D07 D14 D28 D42
AS1-5 Ra-Rb AS1-5 Ra-Rb AS1-5 Ra-Rb AS1-5 Ra-Rb AS1-5 Ra-Rb
Perm. ANOVA GUT DGGE 2/10 P:0.0001 6/10 P:0.0003 6/10 P:0.0001 7/10 P:0.0003 7/10 P:0.0001
454 P:0.2079 P:0.0025 P:0.0242 P:0.016
ANOSIM DGGE R:0.428 R:0.925 R:0.787 R:0.772 R:0.542 R:0.922 R:0.745 R:0.596 R:0.907 R:0.862
P:0.0005 P:0.0001 P:0.0001 P:0.0001 P:0.0001 P:0.0001 P:0.0001 P:0.0001 P:0.0001 P:0.0001
454 R:1 R:1 R:1 R:0.846
P:0.1 P:0.002 P:0.1 P:0.002
Perm. ANOVA WATER DGGE P:0.0002 P:0.0212 P:0.0002 P:0.0001 P:0.0008
ANOSIM R:0.996 R:0.972 R:1 R:1 R:0.988
P:0.008 P:0.008 P:0.008 P:0.008 P:0.008

Tests were performed by sample type per sampling day, with P values for each comparison from two different statistical tests (PERMANOVA and ANOSIM). ANOSIM results are complementary to the PERMANOVA to provide information on the degree of separation between groups, suggested by R statistic. The 2/10, 6/10 & 7/10 indicate the number of significant out of the total available comparisons. D00, 07, 14, 28, 42: sampling day 0,7,14,28 & 42 respectively, AS1-5: replicate active suspension system 1 till 5, Ra & Rb: replicate recirculating system a & b. P values are based on 9999 Monte Carlo permutations.