Table 3.

Effect of depression symptoms on the weekly odds of sexual intercourse

	Model 1 Univariate		Model 3 Full		Model 4 Reduced
	aOR	CI	aOR	CI	aOR	CI
Depression symptomsa
<Moderate/severe (<4pts CESD)	1		1		1
Moderate/severe (≥4pts CESD)	1.4	0.9,2.2	1.0	0.7,1.6	1.0	0.7,1.5
Race/ethnicity
Non-Black			1		1
Black			0.7^	0.4,1.1	0.6*	0.4,0.9
Educational enrollment
Not enrolled/drop-out			1		1
High school			0.8	0.4,1.4	0.8	0.4,1.4
2 year college			0.9	0.6,1.5	0.9	0.6,1.5
4 year college			0.6^	0.4,1.0	0.6^	0.4,1.1
Employment status
Unemployed			1
Employed			1.2	0.8,1.8
Receiving public assistance
No			1		1
Yes			0.6*	0.4,1.0	0.6*	0.4,0.9
Childhood family structure
2 parents (biological/step)			1
1 parent only			0.8	0.5,1.2
Other			0.7	0.3,1.3
Religious service attendance
< weekly			1		1
≥ weekly			0.5**	0.3,0.8	0.5**	0.3,0.8
Cohabitation status
Not cohabitating			1		1
Cohabitating			8.3***	5.0,13.9	8.4***	5.0,14.0
Age at coitarche
> 16 years			1		1
≤ 16 years			6.3***	4.2,9.5	6.4***	4.3,9.5
History of pregnancy
No			1
Yes			1.1	0.7,1.8

N= 952 women (27,130 weekly journals). Results are adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from univariate, full and reduced multi-level, mixed-effects logistic regression models estimating effect of moderate/severe depression symptoms on the odds of sexual intercourse each week, controlling for a random effect for the woman and number of number of journals completed. P-values (P) significant for two-tailed alpha at <0.05*, <0.01**, and <0.001***; ^p-value marginal at p<0.10. Depression and background covariates were measured at baseline.

^aCenter for Epidemiologic Studies – Depression Scale (CES-D-5) – 4 point cut-off for moderate/severe depression symptoms.