Table III.

UNC Tumor Board Participant Survey Results

Survey Item	Response Percentage* (n=32)
	Yes	No
In general, do you believe the external cases presented through the VTB are appropriate for multidisciplinary discussion?	97%	0%
For most VTB cases presented, is there sufficient patient information available for a productive discussion?	91%	3%
Do videoconferencing technology problems frequently disrupt the virtual case discussions?	9%	88%
Do you believe the VTB program can accommodate more cases than are currently being presented?	72%	3%
Do you believe the VTB case discussions focus appropriately on the issues raised by the presenting physician?	91%	3%
Do you believe that VTB case discussions reach consensus recommendations less frequently than regular UNC tumor board cases?	16%	66%
Do you believe the VTB program is a valuable method for discussing complex cases with community-based clinicians?	100%	0%
Do you believe the VTB program is a valuable method for increasing recruitment for clinical trials?	44%	16%
Do you believe the VTB program is an effective use of UNC resources?	91%	3%
Recommendations for VTB Program Improvement**	Response Percentage*
Marketing campaign to increase VTB participation among community-based clinicians	59%
Streamlining pathology and radiology review to ensure availability for VTB discussion	44%
Communicating clear VTB presentation guidelines for participants to follow	31%
Routinely collecting feedback about the VTB from community-based clinicians and communicating it to UNC participants	28%
Ensuring adequate representation of UNC expertise during VTB (e.g., surgical, transplant, or other specialists who are not regular tumor board attendees)	19%

^*Percentages will not add to 100% if “Don’t Know” was selected or if respondent left item blank

^**Respondents were asked to identify the top two highest impact recommendations